Skip to content

MG4 EV vs Smart #1 UK: value champion vs design premium

The verdict

Buy the MG4. The Extended Range covers 338 miles for £32,995 — 78 miles more than a Smart #1 Pro+ for £3,965 less — and carries a seven-year warranty against Smart's three, with a bigger boot despite being the smaller-looking car. Smart's case is its crash score and the Mercedes-drawn cabin, from a maker that replied to none of its Chinese complaints in 2026 where MG replied to all of them.

Buy the MG4 EV if

You run one car for a family on a budget, keep it past its fifth birthday, and the boot has to take a pushchair and the weekly shop.

Buy the Smart #1 if

You do short town journeys, you have three-phase power at home for the 22 kW charger, and the car goes back at the end of a three-year lease.

DimensionMG4 EVSmart #1
UK price rangeManufacturer figuremg.co.ukuk.smart.comMG4 EV£23,495–£33,995 across SE, Long Range, Extended Range and XPowerBetter hereSmart #1£29,960–£44,960 across Pure, Pro, Pro+, Premium and BRABUS
WLTP rangeManufacturer figuremg.co.ukuk.smart.comMG4 EV338 miles at £32,995Better hereSmart #1260 miles at £36,960
DC fast chargingManufacturer figuremg.co.ukuk.smart.comMG4 EV150 kW maximum (Gen 1), lower on Gen 2 Urban variantsSmart #1130 kW (LFP) / 150 kW (NMC) maximum, 10–80% in ~30 minutes
AC chargingManufacturer figuremg.co.ukuk.smart.comMG4 EV11 kW maximumSmart #122 kW on-board charger (Pro+, Premium, BRABUS)Better here
vehicle warrantyManufacturer figuremg.co.ukuk.smart.comMG4 EV7 years / 80,000 milesBetter hereSmart #13 years / unlimited mileage
boot capacityManufacturer figuremg.co.ukuk.smart.comMG4 EV363L (Gen 1), 471L (Gen 2 Urban)Better hereSmart #1313–323L (seats up), 976–986L (folded)
车质网 manufacturer reply rate (China)12365auto.comMG4 EV100% in 2026Better hereSmart #10% in 2026 — structural red flag

Price and value proposition

The MG4 EV and Smart #1 occupy different ends of the value spectrum in the UK small EV market. The MG4 starts from £23,495 (Urban Gen 2) and tops out at £33,995 for the XPower AWD performance model. The Smart #1 starts significantly higher at £29,960 for the base Pure trim, rising to £44,960 for the BRABUS AWD. The MG4's pricing reflects SAIC's scale and state-backed positioning; the Smart #1's premium reflects Mercedes design input, Geely's SEA platform, and the brand's positioning as a 'premium compact'. But there's more to value than headline price: the MG4 offers a 7-year vehicle warranty vs Smart's 3-year, and the MG4 Extended Range delivers 338 mi WLTP for £32,995 — £3,965 less than the Smart #1 Pro+ (260 mi). For value-focused buyers, the arithmetic is clear.

AttributeMG4 EV Extended RangeSmart #1 Pro+
UK price rangeMG4 EV Extended Range£23,495–£33,995 across SE/Long Range/Extended Range/XPower trimsOfficial figuremg.co.ukSmart #1 Pro+£29,960–£44,960 across Pure/Pro/Pro+/Premium/BRABUS trimsOfficial figureuk.smart.com
WLTP rangeMG4 EV Extended Range338 miles at £32,995Official figuremg.co.ukSmart #1 Pro+260 miles at £36,960Official figureuk.smart.com
vehicle warrantyMG4 EV Extended Range7 years / 80,000 milesOfficial figuremg.co.ukSmart #1 Pro+3 years / unlimited mileageOfficial figureuk.smart.com
Image: Alexander Migl, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Image: Alexander Migl, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Image: Alexander-93, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Image: Alexander-93, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Range and charging capabilities

Range is where the MG4's value proposition becomes starkly clear. The MG4 Extended Range offers 338 mi WLTP for £32,995; the Smart #1 Premium tops out at 273 mi for £42,960. But the Smart #1's base model — the Pure at £29,960 — delivers just 193 mi WLTP from a 49 kWh LFP battery. That's simply inadequate for UK motorway use in 2026; real-world highway cold-weather tests show ~120 mi. The Smart #1 Pro+ (£36,960, 260 mi, 66 kWh NMC) is the minimum viable Smart; anything below that is a compromise you'll regret. The MG4 Urban Gen 2 (201 mi, £23,495) is also short-ranged, but at £23k it's a commuter tool, not a £30k 'premium' car. DC charging is comparable: 150 kW max on MG4 Gen 1 and Smart #1 NMC trims, with 10–80% taking ~30 min. Smart's 22 kW AC on NMC trims is a genuine advantage for destination charging; the MG4 tops out at 11 kW AC.

AttributeMG4 EVSmart #1
maximum WLTP rangeMG4 EV338 miles (Extended Range, 74 kWh NMC)Official figuremg.co.ukSmart #1273 miles (Premium, 66 kWh NMC)Official figureuk.smart.com
minimum WLTP rangeMG4 EV201 miles (Urban Gen 2, 43 kWh LFP)Official figuremg.co.ukSmart #1193 miles (Pure, 49 kWh LFP)Official figureuk.smart.com
DC fast chargingMG4 EV150 kW maximum (Gen 1), lower on Gen 2 Urban variantsOfficial figuremg.co.ukSmart #1130 kW (LFP) / 150 kW (NMC) maximum, 10–80% in ~30 minutesOfficial figureuk.smart.com

Also noted

  • Smart #1 AC charging (NMC trims)22 kW on-board charger (Pro+/Premium/BRABUS)Official figureuk.smart.com

Safety and Euro NCAP performance

Both cars achieved 5-star Euro NCAP ratings, but the Smart #1's result is exceptional: 96% adult occupant protection — one of the highest scores of 2022. The MG4 scored 83% adult (Gen 1, 2022) and 87% (Gen 2 Urban, 2025) under stricter protocols — showing genuine safety progress generation-to-generation. The Smart #1 has no retest drama or caveats; it's a clean, strong result. If safety is your absolute top priority — particularly for family use — the Smart #1's 96% adult score is a differentiator. But the MG4's 5-star ratings for both generations are also solid; the Gen 2's 2025 retest under tougher protocols is real evidence of safety engineering focus, not just passing the test once.

China-side evidence

What Chinese owners report — the data UK sites don't translate

This is where owner data adds genuine insight. MG4 owners on Autohome rate it 4.49/5.0 from 1,514 reviews — higher than BYD Atto 3. Top praise: acceleration (435 mentions), rear seat space (356), ride stability (295). Complaints: tyre noise (210), wind noise (191), interior materials (185). The 车质网 score is 2.3/5.0 — but critically, 1,219 of the 1,420 complaints are about dealer/service issues, not the car itself. Only 201 are product quality complaints. Smart #1 Autohome score is lower at 4.07/5.0, with 112 faults/100 cars (mid-pack). The headline China complaint is short range on the base LFP car — exactly the same issue UK buyers should avoid. But the red flag is Smart's 0% manufacturer reply rate on 车质网 in 2026. MG's reply rate is 100%. This isn't just a China problem — it signals a brand culture around customer support. For UK buyers, the Smart #1's 0% reply rate is a structural warning sign that merits testing dealer responsiveness before purchase.

AttributeMG4 EVSmart #1
China owner ratingMG4 EV4.49 / 5.0 from 1,514 reviewsk.m.autohome.com.cnSmart #14.07 / 5.0k.m.autohome.com.cn
车质网 manufacturer reply rate (China)MG4 EV100% in 202612365auto.comSmart #10% in 2026 — structural red flag12365auto.com
China complaint recordMG4 EV1,219 service/dealer complaints vs 201 product quality complaints12365auto.comSmart #130 service complaints vs 6 quality complaints in 202612365auto.com

Owner reports, complaint records and recall notices from the Chinese market, each with the source and the date we read it. Sample sizes are small; read them as signals, not survey results.

Platform, parent company, and survival risk

The MG4 and Smart #1 have very different ownership structures. The MG4 is a pure SAIC Motor product — Shanghai state-owned, Fortune 500 #93, 7th largest automaker globally. Survival risk is very low. The Smart #1 is a 50/50 joint venture between Geely and Mercedes-Benz — Geely provides the SEA platform and manufacturing (Xi'an, China), Mercedes provides design and brand. Survival risk is low-medium; both parents are financially solid, but JVs have strategic risk if either partner re-prioritises. Smart's Chinese sales volumes are modest; the brand needs scale. The platform story is also different: the MG4 is on SAIC's MSP (Gen 1) or E3 (Gen 2) platforms; the Smart #1 shares Geely's SEA platform with the Volvo EX30 and Zeekr X. That means the Smart #1 competes internally against its platform siblings — the EX30 is essentially the same car with a Volvo badge. For UK buyers, SAIC's state backing means near-zero risk of the brand disappearing; Smart's JV structure means the brand exists only as long as both Geely and Mercedes want it to.

AttributeMG4 EVSmart #1
brand survival riskMG4 EVVery low — SAIC is state-owned, publicly traded, globally diversified, H1 2025 revenue ¥299.59B with positive cash flowOfficial figuresaicmotor.comSmart #1Low-medium — both Geely and Mercedes are financially solid, but JV structure creates strategic risk if either partner re-prioritises; Smart's Chinese sales volumes are modestManufacturer figuresmart.com

Also noted

  • MG4 EV parent companySAIC Motor (上海汽车集团), Shanghai state-owned, Fortune 500 #93, 7th largest automaker globallyOfficial figureen.wikipedia.org
  • Smart #1 parent company structure50/50 joint venture between Geely (engineering/manufacturing) and Mercedes-Benz (design/brand), established 2019 as 智马达汽车有限公司Official figuresmart.com
  • Smart #1 platformGeely SEA platform, shared with Volvo EX30 and Zeekr XOfficial figuresmart.com
  • MG4 EV platform (Gen 1 vs Gen 2)Gen 1 on MSP platform (RWD, multi-link rear), Gen 2 Urban on E3 platform (FWD, torsion beam rear, CTB architecture)Official figuremg.co.uk

UK ownership considerations — what actually matters day-to-day

Three UK-specific factors tilt the scales. First: warranty. The MG4's 7-year/80,000-mile vehicle warranty is segment-standard; the Smart #1's 3-year/unlimited mileage is conspicuously short (Kia/Hyundai offer 7 years). This matters if you plan to keep the car beyond the warranty period. Second: boot space. The MG4 Gen 1 offers 363L; the Gen 2 Urban improves to 471L. The Smart #1 offers 313–323L — smaller than the MG4 despite being an SUV-crossover. If you carry luggage regularly, the MG4 wins. Third: the 'MG4' name means two different cars in the UK. The Urban (Gen 2, FWD, torsion beam) drives differently from the original MG4 EV (Gen 1, RWD, multi-link). You need to know which one you're buying. The Smart #1 is simpler: one platform, RWD (or AWD for BRABUS), consistent driving dynamics. The MG4's 7-year warranty, larger boot, and significantly lower price make it the rational choice for most buyers. The Smart #1's 96% NCAP score and Mercedes design DNA justify the premium only if safety and styling are your absolute priorities.

AttributeMG4 EVSmart #1
boot capacityMG4 EV363L (Gen 1), 471L (Gen 2 Urban)Official figuremg.co.ukSmart #1313–323L (seats up), 976–986L (folded)Official figureuk.smart.com

Also noted

  • MG4 EV UK Driver Power rankingDead last in both 2023 and 2024 surveys — brand perception challenge independent of productOfficial figurecarmagazine.co.uk
  • Smart #1 UK expert ratingsThe Car Expert A- (77%), Carwow 8/10, What Car? Best Small Electric SUV 2024Official figureuk.smart.com

Verdict — which one should you actually buy?

The MG4 EV vs Smart #1 comparison isn't about which car is 'better' — it's about what you value. If price, range, warranty, and practicality matter: buy the MG4. The Extended Range (338 mi, £32,995) is the sweet spot — RWD handling, multi-link suspension, 7-year warranty, massive range for the money. Skip the Urban unless you absolutely need the lowest entry price. If safety, design, and brand perception matter more: consider the Smart #1 Pro+ (£36,960, 260 mi). The 96% adult NCAP score is exceptional, the Mercedes design DNA is real, and the Geely SEA platform is proven. But be aware of the 3-year warranty gap and the 0% complaint reply rate in China — test dealer responsiveness before committing. For most UK buyers, the MG4 is the rational choice: more range, more warranty, more boot, significantly less money. The Smart #1 is the emotional choice: you're paying £3–10k more for design, safety scores, and a Mercedes-adjacent badge. Both are legitimate — just know which decision framework you're using before you test drive.

AttributeMG4 EVSmart #1
recommended trim for most buyersMG4 EVExtended Range at £32,995 — 338 mi WLTP, RWD, 7-year warranty, best value propositionOfficial figuremg.co.ukSmart #1Pro+ at £36,960 — 260 mi WLTP, 66 kWh NMC, 96% adult NCAP, skip base LFP Pure entirelyOfficial figureuk.smart.com

Also noted

  • Price difference (recommended trims)Smart #1 Pro+ (£36,960) costs £3,965 more than MG4 Extended Range (£32,995) for 78 miles less WLTP rangeOfficial figuremg.co.ukuk.smart.com
  • Warranty gap (recommended trims)MG4 offers 7-year vehicle warranty vs Smart's 3-year — 4-year difference is material for long-term ownershipOfficial figuremg.co.ukuk.smart.com

Frequently asked questions

How much does the MG4 EV cost compared to the Smart #1?
The MG4 EV starts from £23,495 and tops out at £33,995 for the XPower AWD. The Smart #1 starts significantly higher at £29,960 for the base Pure trim, rising to £44,960 for the BRABUS AWD.
Which has the longer range, the MG4 or Smart #1?
The MG4 Extended Range offers 338 miles WLTP for £32,995, while the Smart #1's top trim, the Premium, tops out at 273 miles for £42,960. The Smart #1's base Pure model manages just 193 miles WLTP, inadequate for UK motorway use.
What warranty do the MG4 and Smart #1 have?
The MG4 EV comes with a 7-year, 80,000-mile vehicle warranty, segment-standard for the class. The Smart #1's vehicle warranty is only 3 years, unlimited mileage, conspicuously short compared with Kia or Hyundai's 7 years, which matters if you plan to keep the car long-term.
Which is safer, the MG4 or Smart #1?
Both achieved 5-star Euro NCAP ratings, but the Smart #1's result is exceptional at 96% adult occupant protection, one of the highest scores of 2022. The MG4 scored 83% adult in its Gen 1 test and improved to 87% in the Gen 2 Urban's 2025 retest under stricter protocols.
Which brand is more likely to survive long-term, MG or Smart?
MG's parent, SAIC Motor, is Shanghai state-owned and the seventh-largest automaker globally, giving it very low survival risk. Smart is a 50/50 joint venture between Geely and Mercedes-Benz; both parents are financially solid, but the brand carries low-to-medium risk since it exists only as long as both partners want it to.